Elizabeth Evatt is Australia’s first woman Federal Court judge and the 81-year-old legal eagle is in Malaysia to observe Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy appeal.
However, she is puzzled as to why the sodomy law seems to be mainly applied on the opposition leader.
Speaking to reporters at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, Evatt, who is representing the International Commission of Jurists, said she noticed that not many people are charged with sodomy in Malaysia and most of the cases involved Anwar.
Sumber klik sini.
Nampak sangat walaupun Elizabeth Evatt ni seorang yang dihormati oleh institusi perundangan Australia....Nampaknya beliau langsung tidak tahu-menahu pasal perundangan, adat-resam, sesitiviti, sejarah perundangan dan kes2 yang dibicarakan.
Jika beliau peka dan menghormati undang2 negara, beliau pasti tidak akan membuat kenyataan terbuka yang menggelar undang2 liwat sebagai satu undang2 yang lapuk...
Tambahan pula apa motif beliau untuk mengatakan perkara tersebut??? Adakah beliau percaya Anwar bersalah???
For Mdm. Evatt, "This is a Muslim country and for your information sodomy is not only prohibited in the Syariah law but as well as the civil law. That is one of the reason why sodomy cases are quite rare here. But if you really make your research and not just listen to what D.S. Anwar had told you, the sodomise cases in this country had increases tremendously since last decade. Among the reason it may contributed by Anwar trial in 1998, liberation movement to support LGBT by some NGOs and porno influence via internet. Despite sodomise cases that involved young boy, in most rape cases the victim are not only rape but also being sodomised".
Therefore my conclusion, is either Mdm. Evatt is not doing her homework or someone had giving her the script.